Difference between revisions of "Active Filters"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
\end{align} | \end{align} | ||
</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we let <math>Q=\omega_0 RC = \tfrac{R}{\omega_0 L}</math> and <math>\omega_0 = \tfrac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}</math>, then we can rewrite our expression for <math>H\left(s\right)</math> as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | H\left(s\right) = \frac{s\cdot\frac{\omega_0}{Q}}{s^2 + s\cdot\frac{\omega_0}{Q} + \omega_0^2} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|2}}}} |
Revision as of 15:33, 24 March 2021
Passive RLC filters are simple and easy to design and use. However, can we implement them on-chip? Let us look at a simple example to give us a bit more insight regarding this question.
Example: A passive band-pass filter
Consider the filter shown in Fig. 1.
We can write the transfer function as:
-
(1)
-
If we let and , then we can rewrite our expression for as:
-
(2)
-