Difference between revisions of "Noise Analysis"
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Note that the total integrated noise is independent of <math>R</math>. This is due to the fact that the thermal noise spectral density is proportional to <math>R</math>, but the bandwidth is inversely proportional to <math>R</math>, thus cancelling each other out. | Note that the total integrated noise is independent of <math>R</math>. This is due to the fact that the thermal noise spectral density is proportional to <math>R</math>, but the bandwidth is inversely proportional to <math>R</math>, thus cancelling each other out. | ||
− | == Noise Analysis == | + | == Two-Port Noise Analysis == |
− | In general, we perform noise analysis in the small signal domain since, for most circuits, the noise signals are relatively small. Thus, for a circuit with "noisy" elements, we can calculate the noise seen at any port, e.g. the output port, as: | + | In general, we perform noise analysis in the small signal domain since, for most circuits, the noise signals are relatively small, allowing us to use superposition. Thus, for a circuit with "noisy" elements, we can calculate the noise seen at any port, e.g. the output port, as: |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\overline{v^ | + | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\overline{v^2_o}=\sum_k \left|H_{k,o}\right|^2\cdot \overline{v^2_{n,k}}</math>|{{EquationRef|7}}}} |
Where <math>\overline{v^2_{n,k}}</math> is the noise from the <math>k^\mathrm{th}</math> noise source, <math>H_{k,o}</math> is the gain from <math>k^\mathrm{th}</math> noise source to the port of interest, and we also assume the noise sources are independent of each other. | Where <math>\overline{v^2_{n,k}}</math> is the noise from the <math>k^\mathrm{th}</math> noise source, <math>H_{k,o}</math> is the gain from <math>k^\mathrm{th}</math> noise source to the port of interest, and we also assume the noise sources are independent of each other. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Input Equivalent Noise Generators === | ||
+ | The output noise is a convenient metric to show how "noisy" a circuit is, since it is easy to measure. However, comparing the noise performance of different circuits solely based on the output noise can lead to erroneous results since the output noise also depends on the circuit gain. Thus, we are not sure if a large output noise is due to the inherent noise of the circuit, or possibly due to a relatively large gain. In order to remove this dependency on the circuit gain, we can instead model a "noisy" two-port network using input equivalent noise generators, as shown in Fig. 4. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thus, we can replace any noisy two-port network with a noiseless two-port network and (1) an equivalent input voltage noise source, <math>\overline{v_n^2}</math>, and (2) an equivalent current noise source, <math>\overline{i_n^2}</math>. Note that in general, these noise sources are correlated, but let us ignore the correlation for now. |
Revision as of 10:06, 8 October 2020
Once we have our device models with the appropriate noise generators, we can determine the effects of these individual noise sources on the behavior of larger circuits. Consider the linear and time invariant (LTI) system with transfer function shown in Fig. 1. If we inject noise , we would get:
-
(1)
-
Thus, the output noise spectrum is shaped or "filtered" by the magnitude of the transfer function. Note that the phase is random and cannot be determined. The total integrated noise at the output of the LTI system is:
-
(2)
-
Contents
Passive Circuits
For the generalized passive circuit shown in Fig. 2, composed of only "noisy" resistors, plus ideal capacitors and inductors, and with an effective impedance across terminals and equal to , the equivalent noise is:
-
(3)
-
Note that since is frequency dependent, the spectral density of the noise is shaped by the inductors and capacitors, even though only the resistors generate noise. We can then calculate the total integrated noise:
-
(4)
-
Example: An RC Circuit
Given the RC circuit in Fig. 3, we can calculate the equivalent impedance seen at the two terminals as:
-
(5)
-
Where . Thus, the total integrated noise is:
-
(6)
-
Note that the total integrated noise is independent of . This is due to the fact that the thermal noise spectral density is proportional to , but the bandwidth is inversely proportional to , thus cancelling each other out.
Two-Port Noise Analysis
In general, we perform noise analysis in the small signal domain since, for most circuits, the noise signals are relatively small, allowing us to use superposition. Thus, for a circuit with "noisy" elements, we can calculate the noise seen at any port, e.g. the output port, as:
-
(7)
-
Where is the noise from the noise source, is the gain from noise source to the port of interest, and we also assume the noise sources are independent of each other.
Input Equivalent Noise Generators
The output noise is a convenient metric to show how "noisy" a circuit is, since it is easy to measure. However, comparing the noise performance of different circuits solely based on the output noise can lead to erroneous results since the output noise also depends on the circuit gain. Thus, we are not sure if a large output noise is due to the inherent noise of the circuit, or possibly due to a relatively large gain. In order to remove this dependency on the circuit gain, we can instead model a "noisy" two-port network using input equivalent noise generators, as shown in Fig. 4.
Thus, we can replace any noisy two-port network with a noiseless two-port network and (1) an equivalent input voltage noise source, , and (2) an equivalent current noise source, . Note that in general, these noise sources are correlated, but let us ignore the correlation for now.