|
|
Line 99: |
Line 99: |
| {{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} X_S = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|25}}}} | | {{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} X_S = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|25}}}} |
| | | |
− | {{Note|Key Results: | + | {{Note|'''Key Results''': |
| * The quality factor is the same for the parallel and series circuits when the impedances are the same. | | * The quality factor is the same for the parallel and series circuits when the impedances are the same. |
| | | |
Line 110: |
Line 110: |
| {{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|28}}}} | | {{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|28}}}} |
| }} | | }} |
− |
| |
− | === RC Circuits ===
| |
− | For RC circuits, the series and parallel impedances are:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>Z_S = R_S+\frac{1}{j\omega C_S}=\frac{j\omega R_S C_S + 1}{j\omega C_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|11}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>Z_P =\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P}+j\omega C_P}= \frac{R_P}{1 + j\omega R_P C_P}</math>|{{EquationRef|12}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Setting <math>Z_S = Z_P</math> and rewriting the espressions, we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{j\omega R_S C_S + 1}{j\omega C_S} = \frac{R_P}{1 + j\omega R_P C_P}= \left(j\omega R_S C_S + 1\right)\left(1 + j\omega R_P C_P\right)=j\omega R_P C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|13}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega R_S C_S + j\omega R_P C_P -\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P + 1=j\omega R_P C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|14}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega \left(R_S C_S + R_P C_P - R_P C_S\right) -\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P + 1 = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|15}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Equating the real part and the imaginary part to zero, we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S C_S + R_P C_P - R_P C_S = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|16}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P = 1 = \frac{Q_P}{Q_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|17}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Leading to the result that <math>Q_P=Q_S=Q</math>. Using eq. 17 to solve for <math>R_P C_P</math>, and plugging it into eq. 16, we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S C_S + \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S C_S} - R_P C_S = R_S + \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S C_S^2} - R_P = R_S \left(1+ \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S^2 C_S^2}\right) - R_P = R_S \left(1+ Q^2\right) - R_P = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|18}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | We can then express <math>R_P</math> as a function of <math>R_S</math> and <math>Q_S</math> as:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = R_S \left(1+ Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|19}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Substituting eq. 19 into eq. 17, we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P = \omega^2 R_S^2 \frac{C_S^2}{C_S} \left(1+ Q^2\right) C_P = \frac{1}{Q^2 C_S} \left(1+ Q^2\right) C_P =1</math>|{{EquationRef|20}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | Thus, we can express <math>C_P</math> as:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>C_P = \frac{Q^2}{1+ Q^2} C_S = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}} C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|21}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | For <math>Q^2 \gg 1</math>, we get <math>R_P\approx Q^2 R_S</math> and <math>C_P\approx C_S</math>.
| |
− |
| |
− | === RL Circuits ===
| |
− | In a similar way, we can convert the series RL circuit to its parallel equivalent, and vice versa. Thus, for <math>Z_P = Z_S</math> we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P}+\frac{1}{j\omega L_P}} = \frac{j\omega R_P L_P}{R_P + j\omega L_P} = R_S+j\omega L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|22}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega R_P L_P = \left(R_P + j\omega L_P\right) \left( R_S+j\omega L_S\right) = R_P R_S - \omega^2 L_P L_S + j\omega R_S L_P + j\omega R_P L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|23}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | And once again, we can separate the real and imaginary components of eq. 23. Looking at the real components:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P R_S = \omega^2 L_P L_S </math>|{{EquationRef|24}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{R_P}{\omega L_P} = \frac{ \omega L_S}{R_S } = Q_P = Q_S = Q</math>|{{EquationRef|25}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | And for the imaginary components:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P L_P = R_S L_P + R_P L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|26}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | From eq. 24, we get:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} </math>|{{EquationRef|27}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | And plugging this into eq. 26 gives us:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P L_P =R_S L_P + \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|28}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P =R_S + \frac{\omega^2 L_S^2}{R_S^2} R_S = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)\approx R_S Q^2</math>|{{EquationRef|29}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | And substituting eq. 29 into eq. 27:
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|30}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{\omega^2 L_S^2}{R_S^2} \frac{L_P}{L_S} = Q^2 \frac{L_P}{L_S}= \left(1 + Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|31}}}}
| |
− |
| |
− | {{NumBlk|::|<math>L_P = L_S \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} = L_S \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right)\approx L_S </math>|{{EquationRef|32}}}}
| |
| | | |
| == Basic Matching Networks == | | == Basic Matching Networks == |
Controlling impedances in RF circuits are essential to maximize power transfer between blocks and to reduce reflections caused by impedance discontinuities along a signal path. In this module, we will define the quality factor, Q, for a device or a circuit, and use this Q to build circuits that modify the impedance seen across a port.
Device Quality Factor
The quality factor, Q, is a measure of how good a device is at storing energy. Thus, the lower the losses, the higher the Q. In general, if we can express the impedance or admittance of a device as
-
|
|
(1)
|
The quality factor can then be expressed as
-
|
|
(2)
|
The imaginary component, represents the energy storage element, and the real component, , represents the loss (resistive) component.
Series RC Circuit
A lossy capacitor can be modeled as a series RC circuit with the series resistance, , could represent the series loss due to interconnect resistances. Thus, the admittance of the lossy capacitor can be expressed as
-
|
|
(3)
|
We can therefore express the quality factor of the series circuit as:
-
|
|
(4)
|
Note that for the lossless case, , and consequently .
Parallel RC Circuit
A lossy capacitor can also be modeled as a parallel RC circuit, with the parallel resistance, could represent the energy loss due to the dielectric leakage of the capacitor. In this case, we can write the impedance of the circuit as:
-
|
|
(5)
|
Thus, the quality factor is:
-
|
|
(6)
|
We can see that in the lossless case, , corresponding to .
RL Circuits
Applying the ideas above to RL circuits, we can get the admittance of a series RL circuit as:
-
|
|
(7)
|
with quality factor:
-
|
|
(8)
|
Similarly, for parallel RL circuits, the impedance and quality factor can be expressed as:
-
|
|
(9)
|
-
|
|
(10)
|
Note that the quality factor is frequency dependent, and for or , we get the ideal case where or respectively.
General Case
In general, for a reactance in series with a resistance ,
-
|
|
(11)
|
-
|
|
(12)
|
and for a reactance in parallel with a resistance ,
-
|
|
(13)
|
-
|
|
(14)
|
Series-Parallel Conversions
It is very convenient to be able to convert the series RC or RL circuit to its parallel equivalent or vice-versa, especially in the context of matching circuits. If we equate the parallel and series impedances, , we get
-
|
|
(15)
|
-
|
|
(16)
|
-
|
|
(17)
|
We can look at the imaginary and real components separately. For the real components:
-
|
|
(18)
|
-
|
|
(19)
|
And for the imaginary components:
-
|
|
(20)
|
Using eq. 18 and eq. 20, we get:
-
|
|
(21)
|
-
|
|
(22)
|
We can use eqs. 18 and 22 to get the relationship between the series and parallel reactances:
-
|
|
(23)
|
-
|
|
(24)
|
Rewriting eq. 24 and for :
-
|
|
(25)
|
Key Results:
- The quality factor is the same for the parallel and series circuits when the impedances are the same.
-
|
|
(26)
|
- The parallel resistance is larger than the series resistance.
-
|
|
(27)
|
- The parallel reactance is approximately equal to the series reactance for .
-
|
|
(28)
|
Basic Matching Networks
We can use our series-parallel conversions to increase or decrease resistances based on the quality factor. Consider the circuit below, where we want to match the source resistance, to a load resistance, using a lossless matching network:
L-Match Circuits
Consider the circuit below, and assume . Since we know that the parallel resistance of the RC circuit gets reduced when converting it to a series RC circuit:
-
|
|
(33)
|
Where . The capacitor also gets transformed into:
-
|
|
(34)
|
Thus, to keep the impedance seen by the source purely resistive, we can cancel out the capacitance by the inductance :
-
|
|
(35)
|
Note that matching circuit is narrowband since the perfect cancellation occurs at only one frequency, . If we set and define for , we can write eq. 33 as
-
|
|
(36)
|
We can then solve for the values of and for a certain frequency as
-
|
|
(37)
|
-
|
|
(38)
|
For the case when , we just flip the circuit and the equations would still hold.
In general, if we want to convert a resistance from a higher ressitance, , to a lower resistance, , we place the parallel capacitance across . Thus for a certain frequency :
-
|
|
(39)
|
-
|
|
(40)
|
-
|
|
(41)
|
-
|
|
(42)
|
Instead of a capacitor, we can place an inductor in parallel with the larger resistance, and use a capacitor to cancel out the series equivalent inductance. However, in this case, the capacitor serves as a DC and low-frequency block.
Loss in Matching Networks
T and Pi Matching Networks