Difference between revisions of "Quality Factor"

From Microlab Classes
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
== Pole Quality Factor ==
 
== Pole Quality Factor ==
 +
[[File:Pole Q.svg|thumb|300px|Figure 3: The pole quality factor.]]
 
The quality factor of a pole is a good indicator of the "cost" of implementing a pole. Higher Q poles have more stringent requirements in terms of loss, thus the pole Q allows us to determine which poles require more resources to implement.
 
The quality factor of a pole is a good indicator of the "cost" of implementing a pole. Higher Q poles have more stringent requirements in terms of loss, thus the pole Q allows us to determine which poles require more resources to implement.
  
Line 52: Line 53:
  
 
== Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor ==
 
== Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor ==
 +
[[File:Bp filter Q.svg|thumb|400px|Figure 4: The band-pass filter quality factor.]]
 
The band-pass filter quality factor, <math>Q_{BP}</math> is a measure of the filter's bandwidth. The higher the quality factor, the more selectivity we have, and hence, lower loss is required to implement the filter. Thus, the band-pass filter quality factor is defined as:
 
The band-pass filter quality factor, <math>Q_{BP}</math> is a measure of the filter's bandwidth. The higher the quality factor, the more selectivity we have, and hence, lower loss is required to implement the filter. Thus, the band-pass filter quality factor is defined as:
  
Line 59: Line 61:
  
 
Where <math>\omega_c</math> is the center filter frequency, and <math>\Delta \omega = \omega_2 - \omega_1</math> is the filter bandwidth, as shown in Fig. 4.
 
Where <math>\omega_c</math> is the center filter frequency, and <math>\Delta \omega = \omega_2 - \omega_1</math> is the filter bandwidth, as shown in Fig. 4.
 
{|
 
|[[File:Pole Q.svg|thumb|300px|Figure 3: The pole quality factor.]]
 
|[[File:Bp filter Q.svg|thumb|300px|Figure 4: The band-pass filter quality factor.]]
 
|-
 
|}
 

Revision as of 20:37, 16 March 2021

Let us review the many definitions of the quality factor, . This context-dependent metric can allow us to gain important insights on the behavior and implementation of energy storage and loss in circuits.

Component Quality Factor

For a transfer function that we can write as:

 

 

 

 

(1)

We can define the component quality factor, , as:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Example: A Lossy Inductor

For a lossy inductor, modeled as an ideal inductor with a series resistance, , as shown in Fig. 1, we can write the admittance as:

 

 

 

 

(3)

The quality factor of the lossy inductor is then equal to:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Example: A Lossy Capacitor

For a lossy capacitor, modeled as an ideal capacitor in parallel with a resistance, , as shown in Fig. 2, we can write the impedance as:

 

 

 

 

(5)

The quality factor of the lossy capacitor is then equal to:

 

 

 

 

(6)

Pole Quality Factor

Figure 3: The pole quality factor.

The quality factor of a pole is a good indicator of the "cost" of implementing a pole. Higher Q poles have more stringent requirements in terms of loss, thus the pole Q allows us to determine which poles require more resources to implement.

Consider the pole shown in Fig. 3. We define the pole quality factor as:

 

 

 

 

(7)

Where is the distance of the pole from the origin, and is the distance of the pole from the -axis. This means that higher Q poles are closer to the -axis.

Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor

Figure 4: The band-pass filter quality factor.

The band-pass filter quality factor, is a measure of the filter's bandwidth. The higher the quality factor, the more selectivity we have, and hence, lower loss is required to implement the filter. Thus, the band-pass filter quality factor is defined as:

 

 

 

 

(8)

Where is the center filter frequency, and is the filter bandwidth, as shown in Fig. 4.