Difference between revisions of "Passive Matching Networks"

From Microlab Classes
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(77 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Controlling impedances in RF circuits are essential to maximize power transfer between blocks and to reduce reflections caused by impedance discontinuities along a signal path. In this module, we will define the quality factor, Q, for a device or a circuit, and use this Q to build circuits that modify the impedance seen across a port.
+
Controlling impedances in radio-frequency (RF) circuits is essential in order to maximize power transfer between blocks and to reduce reflections caused by impedance discontinuities along a signal path. In this module, we will define the quality factor, <math>Q</math>, for a device or a circuit, and use this <math>Q</math> to build circuits that modify the impedance seen across a port.
  
 
== Device Quality Factor ==
 
== Device Quality Factor ==
The quality factor, Q, is a measure of how good a device is at storing energy. Thus, the lower the losses, the higher the Q. In general, if we can express the impedance or admittance of a device as  
+
The quality factor, <math>Q</math>, is a measure of how good a device is at storing energy. Thus, the lower the losses, the higher the <math>Q</math>. In general, if we can express the impedance or admittance of a device as  
  
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y\,\mathrm{or}\,Z=\frac{1}{A + jB}</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y\,\mathrm{or}\,Z=\frac{1}{A + jB}</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}}
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
=== Series RC Circuit ===
 
=== Series RC Circuit ===
A lossy capacitor can be modeled as a series RC circuit with the series resistance, <math>R_S</math>, could represent the series loss due to interconnect resistances. Thus, the admittance of the lossy capacitor can be expressed as  
+
[[File:RC Qseries.png|thumb|400px|Figure 1: A lossy capacitor.]]
 +
 
 +
A lossy capacitor, shown in Fig. 1, can be modeled as a series RC circuit with the series resistance, <math>R_S</math>, could represent the series loss due to interconnect resistances. Thus, the admittance of the lossy capacitor can be expressed as  
  
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y_S =\frac{1}{R_S+\frac{1}{j\omega C}}</math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}}
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y_S =\frac{1}{R_S+\frac{1}{j\omega C}}</math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}}
Line 35: Line 37:
  
 
=== RL Circuits ===
 
=== RL Circuits ===
Applying the ideas above to RL circuits, we can get the admittance of a series RL circuit as:
+
[[File:RL Qseries.png|thumb|400px|Figure 2: A lossy inductor.]]
 +
 
 +
Applying the ideas above to RL circuits in Fig. 2, we can get the admittance of a series RL circuit as:
  
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y_S =\frac{1}{R_S+j\omega L}</math>|{{EquationRef|7}}}}
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Y_S =\frac{1}{R_S+j\omega L}</math>|{{EquationRef|7}}}}
Line 52: Line 56:
  
 
=== General Case ===
 
=== General Case ===
 +
[[File:Generic Qseries.png|thumb|400px|Figure 3: A lossy reactance.]]
 +
 
In general, for a reactance <math>X_S</math> in series with a resistance <math>R_S</math>,
 
In general, for a reactance <math>X_S</math> in series with a resistance <math>R_S</math>,
  
Line 65: Line 71:
  
 
== Series-Parallel Conversions ==
 
== Series-Parallel Conversions ==
It is very convenient to be able to convert the series RC or RL circuit to its parallel equivalent or vice-versa, especially in the context of matching circuits.  
+
It is very convenient to be able to convert the series RC or RL circuit to its parallel equivalent or vice-versa, especially in the context of matching circuits. If we equate the parallel and series impedances, <math>\tfrac{1}{Y_S} = Z_S = Z_P</math>, we get
 
 
If we equate the parallel and series impedances, <math>Z_S = Z_P</math>, we get
 
  
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S+ jX_S =\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P} + \frac{1}{jX_P}} = \frac{jR_P X_P}{R_P + jX_P}</math>|{{EquationRef|15}}}}
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S+ jX_S =\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P} + \frac{1}{jX_P}} = \frac{jR_P X_P}{R_P + jX_P}</math>|{{EquationRef|15}}}}
Line 85: Line 89:
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P X_S + R_S X_P = R_P X_P</math>|{{EquationRef|20}}}}
 
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P X_S + R_S X_P = R_P X_P</math>|{{EquationRef|20}}}}
  
=== RC Circuits ===
+
Using eq. 18 and eq. 20, we get:
For RC circuits, the series and parallel impedances are:
+
 
 +
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{X_S X_P}{R_S} X_S + R_S X_P = R_P X_P</math>|{{EquationRef|21}}}}
 +
 
 +
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{X_S^2}{R_S^2} R_S + R_S = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)= R_P </math>|{{EquationRef|22}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Z_S = R_S+\frac{1}{j\omega C_S}=\frac{j\omega R_S C_S + 1}{j\omega C_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|11}}}}
+
We can use eqs. 18 and 22 to get the relationship between the series and parallel reactances:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Z_P =\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P}+j\omega C_P}= \frac{R_P}{1 + j\omega R_P C_P}</math>|{{EquationRef|12}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S R_P - X_S X_P = R_S^2\left(1 + Q^2\right) - X_S X_P =0</math>|{{EquationRef|23}}}}
  
Setting <math>Z_S = Z_P</math> and rewriting the espressions, we get:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S^2\left(1 + Q^2\right) - X_S X_P =R_S^2\left(1 + Q^2\right)\frac{X_S^2}{X_S^2} - X_S X_P = \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} X_S - X_P = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|24}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{j\omega R_S C_S + 1}{j\omega C_S} = \frac{R_P}{1 + j\omega R_P C_P}= \left(j\omega R_S C_S + 1\right)\left(1 + j\omega R_P C_P\right)=j\omega R_P C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|13}}}}
+
Rewriting eq. 24 and for <math>Q^2 \gg 1</math>:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega R_S C_S + j\omega R_P C_P -\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P + 1=j\omega R_P C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|14}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} X_S = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|25}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega \left(R_S C_S + R_P C_P - R_P C_S\right) -\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P + 1 = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|15}}}}
+
{{Note|'''Key Results''':
 +
* The quality factor is the same for the parallel and series circuits when the impedances are the same.
  
Equating the real part and the imaginary part to zero, we get:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{R_P}{X_P} = Q_P = \frac{X_S}{R_S} = Q_S = Q</math>|{{EquationRef|26}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S C_S + R_P C_P - R_P C_S = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|16}}}}
+
* The parallel resistance is larger than the series resistance.
 +
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|27}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P = 1 = \frac{Q_P}{Q_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|17}}}}
+
* The parallel reactance is approximately equal to the series reactance for <math>Q^2 \gg 1</math>.
 +
{{NumBlk|::|<math>X_P = \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right) X_S \approx X_S</math>|{{EquationRef|28}}}}
 +
}}
  
Leading to the result that <math>Q_P=Q_S=Q</math>. Using eq. 17 to solve for <math>R_P C_P</math>, and plugging it into eq. 16, we get:
+
== Basic Matching Networks ==
 +
[[File:Matching block diagram.png|thumb|400px|Figure 4: An impedance matching network.]]
 +
We can use our series-parallel conversions to increase or decrease resistances based on the quality factor. Consider the circuit in Fig. 4, where we want to match the source resistance, <math>R_S</math> to a load resistance, <math>R_L</math> using a lossless matching network, i.e. a network make up of only reactances.
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_S C_S + \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S C_S} - R_P C_S = R_S + \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S C_S^2} - R_P =  R_S \left(1+ \frac{1}{\omega^2 R_S^2 C_S^2}\right) - R_P = R_S \left(1+ Q^2\right) - R_P = 0</math>|{{EquationRef|18}}}}
+
=== L-Section Matching Circuits ===
 +
[[File:Matching L section.png|thumb|300px|Figure 5: An L-Section matching network and the network after the parallel-to-serial transformation of <math>R_L</math> and <math>jX_1</math>.]]
  
We can then express <math>R_P</math> as a function of <math>R_S</math> and <math>Q_S</math> as:
+
Consider the circuit in Fig. 5, and assume <math>R_S<R_L</math>. We can use our parallel-series transformations to convert the parallel circuit into a series circuit so that the the series resistance <math>R_L^\prime</math> is equivalent to the source resistance, <math>R_S</math>
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = R_S \left(1+ Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|19}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_L^\prime = \frac{R_L}{1 + Q^2}</math>|{{EquationRef|29}}}}
  
Substituting eq. 19 into eq. 17, we get:
+
Where <math>Q =\frac{R_L}{X_1}</math>. The reactance <math>X_1</math> also gets transformed into:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\omega^2 R_S C_S R_P C_P = \omega^2 R_S^2 \frac{C_S^2}{C_S} \left(1+ Q^2\right) C_P =  \frac{1}{Q^2 C_S} \left(1+ Q^2\right) C_P =1</math>|{{EquationRef|20}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>X_1^\prime = X_1 \frac{1}{\left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right)} \approx X_1</math>|{{EquationRef|30}}}}
  
Thus, we can express <math>C_P</math> as:
+
Thus, to keep the impedance seen by the source purely resistive, we can cancel out the reactance <math>X_1^\prime</math> by the reactance <math>X_2 = -X_1^\prime \approx -X_1</math>. Note that the negative sign relating <math>X_1</math> and <math>X_2</math> means that if <math>X_1</math> is a capacitance, then <math>X_2</math> should be an inductance, and vice-versa. Note that cancelling reactances at resonance could cause large voltages to appear across (or large currents through) the reactances. See this note on [[Resonance | resonance]] for more details. For the case when <math>R_S>R_L</math>, we just flip the circuit and the equations would still hold.
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>C_P = \frac{Q^2}{1+ Q^2} C_S = \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}} C_S</math>|{{EquationRef|21}}}}
+
=== Design Example ===
 +
Let define the ''matching factor'' <math>m =\tfrac{R_{\mathrm{hi}}}{R_{\mathrm{lo}}}</math>, where <math>R_\mathrm{hi}=\max\left(R_S, R_L\right)</math> and <math>R_\mathrm{lo}=\min\left(R_S, R_L\right)</math>. Therefore for <math>R_L>R_S</math>, <math>R_{\mathrm{hi}}=R_L</math> and <math>R_{\mathrm{lo}}=R_S</math>. We can then use eq. 29 to solve for the value of <math>Q</math>, <math>X_1</math>, and <math>X_1^\prime</math>:
  
For <math>Q^2 \gg 1</math>, we get <math>R_P\approx Q^2 R_S</math> and <math>C_P\approx C_S</math>.
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q=\sqrt{m - 1} = \frac{R_L}{X_1}=\frac{X_1^\prime}{R_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|31}}}}
  
=== RL Circuits ===
+
If we use a capacitor for <math>X_1</math>, then <math>C_1 = \tfrac{1}{\omega X_1}</math>. Thus, we need an inductance, <math>L_2=\tfrac{X_2}{\omega} =\tfrac{-X_1^\prime}{\omega}\approx \tfrac{-X_1}{\omega}</math>. Solving for <math>L_2</math>:
In a similar way, we can convert the series RL circuit to its parallel equivalent, and vice versa. Thus, for <math>Z_P = Z_S</math> we get:
 
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_P}+\frac{1}{j\omega L_P}} = \frac{j\omega R_P L_P}{R_P + j\omega L_P} = R_S+j\omega L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|22}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>L_2 = \frac{1}{\omega^2 C_1^\prime} \approx \frac{1}{\omega^2 C_1}</math>|{{EquationRef|32}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>j\omega R_P L_P = \left(R_P + j\omega L_P\right) \left( R_S+j\omega L_S\right) = R_P R_S - \omega^2 L_P L_S + j\omega R_S L_P + j\omega R_P L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|23}}}}
+
Note that matching circuit is narrowband since the perfect cancellation occurs at only one frequency, <math>\omega</math>.
  
And once again, we can separate the real and imaginary components of eq. 23. Looking at the real components:
+
Instead of a capacitor, we can place an inductor in parallel with the larger resistance, and use a series capacitor to cancel out the series equivalent inductance. However, in this case, the capacitor will block any DC and low-frequency signals.
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P R_S = \omega^2 L_P L_S </math>|{{EquationRef|24}}}}
+
== Loss in Matching Networks ==
 +
[[File:Lossy L match.png|thumb|400px|Figure 6: A lossy L-section.]]
 +
In typical real matching networks, the series resistance of the inductor is the dominant loss mechanism. We can model this loss using a resistor <math>R_2</math> in series with the inductor <math>L_2</math>, as shown in Fig. 6.
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{R_P}{\omega L_P} = \frac{ \omega L_S}{R_S } = Q_P = Q_S = Q</math>|{{EquationRef|25}}}}
+
To determine the power loss due to <math>R_2</math>, we first calculate the power delivered by the input source:
  
And for the imaginary components:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>P_{\mathrm{in}} = \frac{V_{\mathrm{in}}^2}{R_2 + R_L^\prime}</math>|{{EquationRef|33}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P L_P = R_S L_P + R_P L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|26}}}}
+
Then we calculate the power delivered to the load, <math>R_L</math>:
  
From eq. 24, we get:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>P_L = \left(V_{\mathrm{in}} \frac{R_L^\prime}{R_2 + R_L^\prime}\right)^2 \frac{1}{R_L^\prime}</math>|{{EquationRef|34}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} </math>|{{EquationRef|27}}}}
+
We can then define power loss as
  
And plugging this into eq. 26 gives us:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\mathrm{Loss} = \frac{P_{\mathrm{in}}}{P_L}=\frac{R_2 + R_L^\prime}{R_L^\prime}=1 + \frac{R_2}{R_L^\prime}=1 + \frac{R_2\left(1 + Q^2\right)}{R_L}</math>|{{EquationRef|35}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P L_P =R_S L_P + \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} L_S</math>|{{EquationRef|28}}}}
+
Note that the loss is dependent on the ratio of <math>R_2</math> to <math>R_L^\prime</math>. Thus, even if <math>R_2</math> is small, <math>R_L^\prime</math> can be relatively small as well, depending on the value of <math>Q</math>. In some cases, it is more convenient to use the inverse of eq. 35, or commonly known as ''Insertion Loss'' (IL):
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P =R_S + \frac{\omega^2 L_S^2}{R_S^2} R_S = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)\approx R_S Q^2</math>|{{EquationRef|29}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\mathrm{IL}=\frac{P_L}{P_\mathrm{in}}=\frac{1}{\mathrm{Loss}}</math>|{{EquationRef|36}}}}
  
And substituting eq. 29 into eq. 27:
+
If we define the inductor component quality factor as <math>Q_c = \tfrac{\omega L_2}{R_2}</math>, with <math>Q = \omega C_1 R_L =\tfrac{1}{\omega C_1^\prime R_L^\prime}</math> and <math>\omega^2 = \tfrac{1}{L_2 C_1^\prime}</math>, we can express the loss as:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_P = \frac{\omega^2 L_P L_S}{R_S} = R_S\left(1 + Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|30}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\mathrm{Loss} = 1 + \frac{R_2}{R_L^\prime} = 1 + \frac{\frac{\omega L_2}{Q_c}}{\frac{1}{\omega C_1^\prime Q}}=1 + \frac{Q}{Q_c}</math>|{{EquationRef|37}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>\frac{\omega^2 L_S^2}{R_S^2} \frac{L_P}{L_S} = Q^2 \frac{L_P}{L_S}= \left(1 + Q^2\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|31}}}}
+
== T- and <math>\Pi</math>-Matching Networks ==
 +
[[File:Pi match.png|thumb|400px|Figure 7: A <math>\Pi</math>-matching network.]]
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>L_P = L_S \frac{1 + Q^2}{Q^2} = L_S \left(1 + \frac{1}{Q^2}\right)\approx L_S </math>|{{EquationRef|32}}}}
+
Single L-section matching circuits are simple and elegant. However, we cannot choose the value of <math>Q</math> since it is determined by <math>m = \tfrac{R_\mathrm{hi}}{R_\mathrm{lo}}</math>. One way to increase the value of <math>Q</math> is to use two L-sections and an low intermediate resistance, <math>R_i</math>, where <math>R_i<R_S</math> and <math>R_i<R_L</math>, as shown in the <math>\Pi</math>-network in Fig. 7.
  
== Basic Matching Networks ==
+
The first L-section reduces the value of source resistance, <math>R_S</math>, to the intermediate resistance, <math>R_i</math>, and the second L-section brings resistance from <math>R_i</math> to <math>R_L</math>.
We can use our series-parallel conversions to increase or decrease resistances based on the quality factor. Consider the circuit below, where we want to match the source resistance, <math>R_S</math> to a load resistance, <math>R_L</math> using a lossless matching network:
 
  
=== L-Match Circuits ===
+
We can then compute the quality factor of the two L-sections as:
Consider the circuit below, and assume <math>R_S<R_L</math>. Since we know that the parallel resistance of the RC circuit gets reduced when converting it to a series RC circuit:
 
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_L^\prime = \frac{R_L}{1 + Q^2}</math>|{{EquationRef|33}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q_1 = \sqrt{\frac{R_S}{R_i} - 1} = \frac{X_1}{R_i}=\frac{R_S}{X_1^\prime}</math>|{{EquationRef|38}}}}
  
Where <math>Q =\omega R_L C_1</math>. The capacitor <math>C_1</math> also gets transformed into:
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q_2 = \sqrt{\frac{R_L}{R_i} - 1} = \frac{X_2}{R_i}=\frac{R_L}{X_2^\prime}</math>|{{EquationRef|39}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>C_1^\prime = C_1 \left(1 +\frac{1}{Q^2}\right) \approx C_1</math>|{{EquationRef|34}}}}
+
[[File:Pi match Q.png|thumb|400px|Figure 8: Calculating the overall <math>Q</math> of a <math>\Pi</math>-network.]]
  
Thus, to keep the impedance seen by the source purely resistive, we can cancel out the capacitance <math>C_1^\prime</math> by the inductance <math>L_1</math>:
+
From Fig. 8, the overall <math>Q</math> can be calculated by converting the parallel circuits into their series equivalents. Therefore:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>L_1 = \frac{1}{\omega^2 C_1^\prime}</math>|{{EquationRef|35}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q = \frac{X_1 + X_2}{2R_i} = \frac{Q_1 + Q_2}{2}</math>|{{EquationRef|40}}}}
  
Note that matching circuit is narrowband since the perfect cancellation occurs at only one frequency, <math>\omega</math>. If we set <math>R_S = R_L^\prime</math> and define <math>m = \tfrac{R_L}{R_S}</math> for <math>R_S<R_L</math>, we can write eq. 33 as
+
[[File:T match.png|thumb|400px|Figure 9: A T-matching network.]]
 +
If we want an intermediate resistance, <math>R_i</math>, that is larger than both <math>R_S</math> and <math>R_L</math>, we can use a T-network instead of a <math>\Pi</math>-network, as shown in Fig. 9.  
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q=\sqrt{m - 1} = \omega R_L C_1</math>|{{EquationRef|36}}}}
+
In this case,
  
We can then solve for the values of <math>C_1</math> and <math>L_1</math> for a certain frequency <math>\omega_0</math> as
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q_1 = \sqrt{\frac{R_i}{R_S} - 1} = \frac{R_i}{X_1^\prime}=\frac{X_1}{R_S}</math>|{{EquationRef|41}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>C_1=\frac{\sqrt{m - 1}}{\omega_0 R_L} </math>|{{EquationRef|37}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q_2 = \sqrt{\frac{R_i}{R_L} - 1} = \frac{R_i}{X_2^\prime}=\frac{X_2}{R_L}</math>|{{EquationRef|42}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>L_1=\frac{1}{\omega_0^2 C_1^\prime}\approx \frac{1}{\omega_0^2 C_1}</math>|{{EquationRef|38}}}}
+
Similar to the <math>\Pi</math>-network, the overall T-network quality factor is <math>Q=\tfrac{1}{2}\left(Q_1 + Q_2\right)</math>.
  
For the case when <math>R_S>R_L</math>, we just flip the circuit and the equations would still hold.  
+
== Multi-Section Low-<math>Q</math> Matching ==
 +
[[File:LowQ match.png|thumb|400px|Figure 10: A low-<math>Q</math> cascaded-L matching network.]]
  
In general, if we want to convert a resistance from a higher ressitance, <math>R_{\mathrm{HI}}</math>, to a lower resistance, <math>R_{\mathrm{LO}}</math>, we place the parallel capacitance across <math>R_{\mathrm{HI}}</math>. Thus for a certain frequency <math>\omega_0</math>:
+
T- and <math>\Pi</math>-networks are used to increase the overall <math>Q</math>. However, in some applications, a lower <math>Q</math> is required, especially in broadband circuits. Low <math>Q</math> circuits are also more robust to process variations and have relatively lower losses. To lower the quality factor of a matching network, we can cascade L-sections with an intermediate resistance, <math>R_\mathrm{hi}>R_i>R_\mathrm{lo}</math>, as shown in Fig. 10 for <math>R_S<R_L</math>.
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>m=\frac{R_{\mathrm{HI}}}{R_{\mathrm{LO}}}</math>|{{EquationRef|39}}}}
+
The quality factor can be expressed as
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q=\sqrt{m - 1} = \omega_0 R_{\mathrm{HI}} C_1</math>|{{EquationRef|40}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q = \frac{1}{2}\left(Q_1 + Q_2\right) =\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{R_i}{R_S} - 1} + \sqrt{\frac{R_L}{R_i} - 1}\right)</math>|{{EquationRef|43}}}}
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>C_1=\frac{\sqrt{m - 1}}{\omega_0 R_{\mathrm{HI}}} </math>|{{EquationRef|41}}}}
+
To get the minimum possible <math>Q</math>, we can take the derivative of eq. 43 with respect to <math>R_i</math> and equate it to zero. This results in the optimum intermediate resistance:
  
{{NumBlk|::|<math>L_1\approx \frac{1}{\omega_0^2 C_1}</math>|{{EquationRef|42}}}}
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>R_{i,\mathrm{opt}} = \sqrt{R_S R_L}</math>|{{EquationRef|44}}}}
  
Instead of a capacitor, we can place an inductor in parallel with the larger resistance, and use a capacitor to cancel out the series equivalent inductance. However, in this case, the capacitor serves as a DC and low-frequency block.
+
Which leads to the minimum quality factor for two cascaded L-sections:
  
== Loss in Matching Networks ==
+
{{NumBlk|::|<math>Q_\min = \sqrt{\sqrt{\frac{R_S}{R_L}} - 1}</math>|{{EquationRef|45}}}}
  
== T and Pi Matching Networks ==
+
{{Note|[[229-A1.2 | '''Activity A1.2''' Passive Matching Networks]] -- This activity walks you through the steps in designing and simulating passive matching networks.|reminder}}

Latest revision as of 14:36, 16 September 2020

Controlling impedances in radio-frequency (RF) circuits is essential in order to maximize power transfer between blocks and to reduce reflections caused by impedance discontinuities along a signal path. In this module, we will define the quality factor, , for a device or a circuit, and use this to build circuits that modify the impedance seen across a port.

Device Quality Factor

The quality factor, , is a measure of how good a device is at storing energy. Thus, the lower the losses, the higher the . In general, if we can express the impedance or admittance of a device as

 

 

 

 

(1)

The quality factor can then be expressed as

 

 

 

 

(2)

The imaginary component, represents the energy storage element, and the real component, , represents the loss (resistive) component.

Series RC Circuit

Figure 1: A lossy capacitor.

A lossy capacitor, shown in Fig. 1, can be modeled as a series RC circuit with the series resistance, , could represent the series loss due to interconnect resistances. Thus, the admittance of the lossy capacitor can be expressed as

 

 

 

 

(3)

We can therefore express the quality factor of the series circuit as:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Note that for the lossless case, , and consequently .

Parallel RC Circuit

A lossy capacitor can also be modeled as a parallel RC circuit, with the parallel resistance, could represent the energy loss due to the dielectric leakage of the capacitor. In this case, we can write the impedance of the circuit as:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Thus, the quality factor is:

 

 

 

 

(6)

We can see that in the lossless case, , corresponding to .

RL Circuits

Figure 2: A lossy inductor.

Applying the ideas above to RL circuits in Fig. 2, we can get the admittance of a series RL circuit as:

 

 

 

 

(7)

with quality factor:

 

 

 

 

(8)

Similarly, for parallel RL circuits, the impedance and quality factor can be expressed as:

 

 

 

 

(9)

 

 

 

 

(10)

Note that the quality factor is frequency dependent, and for or , we get the ideal case where or respectively.

General Case

Figure 3: A lossy reactance.

In general, for a reactance in series with a resistance ,

 

 

 

 

(11)

 

 

 

 

(12)

and for a reactance in parallel with a resistance ,

 

 

 

 

(13)

 

 

 

 

(14)

Series-Parallel Conversions

It is very convenient to be able to convert the series RC or RL circuit to its parallel equivalent or vice-versa, especially in the context of matching circuits. If we equate the parallel and series impedances, , we get

 

 

 

 

(15)

 

 

 

 

(16)

 

 

 

 

(17)

We can look at the imaginary and real components separately. For the real components:

 

 

 

 

(18)

 

 

 

 

(19)

And for the imaginary components:

 

 

 

 

(20)

Using eq. 18 and eq. 20, we get:

 

 

 

 

(21)

 

 

 

 

(22)

We can use eqs. 18 and 22 to get the relationship between the series and parallel reactances:

 

 

 

 

(23)

 

 

 

 

(24)

Rewriting eq. 24 and for :

 

 

 

 

(25)

Key Results:
  • The quality factor is the same for the parallel and series circuits when the impedances are the same.

 

 

 

 

(26)

  • The parallel resistance is larger than the series resistance.

 

 

 

 

(27)

  • The parallel reactance is approximately equal to the series reactance for .

 

 

 

 

(28)

Basic Matching Networks

Figure 4: An impedance matching network.

We can use our series-parallel conversions to increase or decrease resistances based on the quality factor. Consider the circuit in Fig. 4, where we want to match the source resistance, to a load resistance, using a lossless matching network, i.e. a network make up of only reactances.

L-Section Matching Circuits

Figure 5: An L-Section matching network and the network after the parallel-to-serial transformation of and .

Consider the circuit in Fig. 5, and assume . We can use our parallel-series transformations to convert the parallel circuit into a series circuit so that the the series resistance is equivalent to the source resistance,

 

 

 

 

(29)

Where . The reactance also gets transformed into:

 

 

 

 

(30)

Thus, to keep the impedance seen by the source purely resistive, we can cancel out the reactance by the reactance . Note that the negative sign relating and means that if is a capacitance, then should be an inductance, and vice-versa. Note that cancelling reactances at resonance could cause large voltages to appear across (or large currents through) the reactances. See this note on resonance for more details. For the case when , we just flip the circuit and the equations would still hold.

Design Example

Let define the matching factor , where and . Therefore for , and . We can then use eq. 29 to solve for the value of , , and :

 

 

 

 

(31)

If we use a capacitor for , then . Thus, we need an inductance, . Solving for :

 

 

 

 

(32)

Note that matching circuit is narrowband since the perfect cancellation occurs at only one frequency, .

Instead of a capacitor, we can place an inductor in parallel with the larger resistance, and use a series capacitor to cancel out the series equivalent inductance. However, in this case, the capacitor will block any DC and low-frequency signals.

Loss in Matching Networks

Figure 6: A lossy L-section.

In typical real matching networks, the series resistance of the inductor is the dominant loss mechanism. We can model this loss using a resistor in series with the inductor , as shown in Fig. 6.

To determine the power loss due to , we first calculate the power delivered by the input source:

 

 

 

 

(33)

Then we calculate the power delivered to the load, :

 

 

 

 

(34)

We can then define power loss as

 

 

 

 

(35)

Note that the loss is dependent on the ratio of to . Thus, even if is small, can be relatively small as well, depending on the value of . In some cases, it is more convenient to use the inverse of eq. 35, or commonly known as Insertion Loss (IL):

 

 

 

 

(36)

If we define the inductor component quality factor as , with and , we can express the loss as:

 

 

 

 

(37)

T- and -Matching Networks

Figure 7: A -matching network.

Single L-section matching circuits are simple and elegant. However, we cannot choose the value of since it is determined by . One way to increase the value of is to use two L-sections and an low intermediate resistance, , where and , as shown in the -network in Fig. 7.

The first L-section reduces the value of source resistance, , to the intermediate resistance, , and the second L-section brings resistance from to .

We can then compute the quality factor of the two L-sections as:

 

 

 

 

(38)

 

 

 

 

(39)

Figure 8: Calculating the overall of a -network.

From Fig. 8, the overall can be calculated by converting the parallel circuits into their series equivalents. Therefore:

 

 

 

 

(40)

Figure 9: A T-matching network.

If we want an intermediate resistance, , that is larger than both and , we can use a T-network instead of a -network, as shown in Fig. 9.

In this case,

 

 

 

 

(41)

 

 

 

 

(42)

Similar to the -network, the overall T-network quality factor is .

Multi-Section Low- Matching

Figure 10: A low- cascaded-L matching network.

T- and -networks are used to increase the overall . However, in some applications, a lower is required, especially in broadband circuits. Low circuits are also more robust to process variations and have relatively lower losses. To lower the quality factor of a matching network, we can cascade L-sections with an intermediate resistance, , as shown in Fig. 10 for .

The quality factor can be expressed as

 

 

 

 

(43)

To get the minimum possible , we can take the derivative of eq. 43 with respect to and equate it to zero. This results in the optimum intermediate resistance:

 

 

 

 

(44)

Which leads to the minimum quality factor for two cascaded L-sections:

 

 

 

 

(45)

Activity A1.2 Passive Matching Networks -- This activity walks you through the steps in designing and simulating passive matching networks.