Difference between revisions of "Quality Factor"
(Created page with "Let us review the many definitions of the '''quality factor''', <math>Q</math>. This context-dependent metric can allow us to gain important insights on the behavior and imple...") |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Component Quality Factor == | == Component Quality Factor == | ||
+ | For a transfer function that we can write as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | H\left(j\omega\right) = \frac{1}{R\left(\omega\right) + jX\left(\omega\right)} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can define the '''component quality factor''', <math>Q</math>, as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Q = \left. \frac{\text{energy stored}}{\text{average power dissipated}}\right|_ \text{over a period of time} = \frac{X\left(\omega\right)}{R\left(\omega\right)} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|2}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Example: A Lossy Inductor === | ||
+ | [[File:Lossy L.png|thumb|300px|Figure 1: A lossy inductor.]] | ||
+ | [[File:Lossy C.png|thumb|300px|Figure 2: A lossy capacitor.]] | ||
+ | For a lossy inductor, modeled as an ideal inductor with a series resistance, <math>R_s</math>, as shown in Fig. 1, we can write the admittance as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Y_L = \frac{I\left(\omega\right)}{V\left(\omega\right)} = \frac{1}{R_s + j\omega L} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|3}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The quality factor of the lossy inductor is then equal to: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Q_L = \frac{\omega L}{R_s} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|4}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Example: A Lossy Capacitor === | ||
+ | For a lossy capacitor, modeled as an ideal capacitor in parallel with a resistance, <math>R_p</math>, as shown in Fig. 2, we can write the impedance as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Z_C = \frac{V\left(\omega\right)}{I\left(\omega\right)} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_p} + j\omega C} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|5}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The quality factor of the lossy capacitor is then equal to: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Q_C = \omega C\cdot R_p | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|6}}}} | ||
== Pole Quality Factor == | == Pole Quality Factor == | ||
+ | The quality factor of a pole is a good indicator of the "cost" of implementing a pole. Higher Q poles have more stringent requirements in terms of loss, thus the pole Q allows us to determine which poles require more resources to implement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consider the pole shown in Fig. 3. We define the pole quality factor as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Q_\text{pole} = \frac{\omega_p}{2\sigma_x} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|7}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where <math>\omega_p</math> is the distance of the pole from the origin, and <math>\sigma_x</math> is the distance of the pole from the <math>j\omega</math>-axis. This means that higher Q poles are closer to the <math>j\omega</math>-axis. | ||
== Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor == | == Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor == | ||
+ | The band-pass filter quality factor, <math>Q_{BP}</math> is a measure of the filter's bandwidth. The higher the quality factor, the more selectivity we have, and hence, lower loss is required to implement the filter. Thus, the band-pass filter quality factor is defined as: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math> | ||
+ | Q_{BP} = \frac{\omega_c}{\omega_2 - \omega_1} = \frac{\omega_c}{\Delta \omega} | ||
+ | </math>|{{EquationRef|8}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where <math>\omega_c</math> is the center filter frequency, and <math>\Delta \omega = \omega_2 - \omega_1</math> is the filter bandwidth, as shown in Fig. 4. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | |[[File:Pole Q.svg|thumb|300px|Figure 3: The pole quality factor.]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Bp filter Q.svg|thumb|400px|Figure 4: The band-pass filter quality factor.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} |
Latest revision as of 20:51, 16 March 2021
Let us review the many definitions of the quality factor, . This context-dependent metric can allow us to gain important insights on the behavior and implementation of energy storage and loss in circuits.
Contents
Component Quality Factor
For a transfer function that we can write as:
-
(1)
-
We can define the component quality factor, , as:
-
(2)
-
Example: A Lossy Inductor
For a lossy inductor, modeled as an ideal inductor with a series resistance, , as shown in Fig. 1, we can write the admittance as:
-
(3)
-
The quality factor of the lossy inductor is then equal to:
-
(4)
-
Example: A Lossy Capacitor
For a lossy capacitor, modeled as an ideal capacitor in parallel with a resistance, , as shown in Fig. 2, we can write the impedance as:
-
(5)
-
The quality factor of the lossy capacitor is then equal to:
-
(6)
-
Pole Quality Factor
The quality factor of a pole is a good indicator of the "cost" of implementing a pole. Higher Q poles have more stringent requirements in terms of loss, thus the pole Q allows us to determine which poles require more resources to implement.
Consider the pole shown in Fig. 3. We define the pole quality factor as:
-
(7)
-
Where is the distance of the pole from the origin, and is the distance of the pole from the -axis. This means that higher Q poles are closer to the -axis.
Band-Pass Filter Quality Factor
The band-pass filter quality factor, is a measure of the filter's bandwidth. The higher the quality factor, the more selectivity we have, and hence, lower loss is required to implement the filter. Thus, the band-pass filter quality factor is defined as:
-
(8)
-
Where is the center filter frequency, and is the filter bandwidth, as shown in Fig. 4.