Difference between revisions of "Integrated Capacitors"
(Created page with "Similar to resistors, in a CMOS process optimized for digital circuits, capacitances are treated as parasitic devices that degrade the performance of digital circuits, except...") |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Similar to resistors, in a CMOS process optimized for digital circuits, capacitances are treated as parasitic devices that degrade the performance of digital circuits, except in specialized cases such as memory circuits. However, in analog design, we often need capacitors with very well-controlled capacitance values. | Similar to resistors, in a CMOS process optimized for digital circuits, capacitances are treated as parasitic devices that degrade the performance of digital circuits, except in specialized cases such as memory circuits. However, in analog design, we often need capacitors with very well-controlled capacitance values. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Capacitor Geometries == | ||
+ | [[File:Parallel plate C.png|thumb|400px|Figure 1: A parallel-plate capacitance.]] | ||
+ | We can create parallel-plate capacitors using the routing layers, typically a metal layer, separated by the inter-layer dielectric (ILD), typically silicon dioxide. Thus, these structures are known as ''metal-oxide-metal'' (MOM) capacitors. The parallel-plate capacitance of the MOM structure shown in Fig. 1, is given by: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{NumBlk|::|<math>C = \frac{\epsilon A}{t} = \frac{\epsilon}{t}\cdot w\cdot \ell = C_\mathrm{layer}\cdot w\cdot \ell</math>|{{EquationRef|1}}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where <math>C_\mathrm{layer} = \tfrac{\epsilon}{t}</math> is the capacitance density, or capacitance per unit area, of a particular layer, <math>\epsilon</math> is the permittivity of the dielectric or insulating material, <math>t</math> is the thickness of the dielectric, and <math>A = w\cdot \ell</math> is the overlap area of the parallel-plate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Parasitic Capacitances === | ||
+ | In addition to the main parallel-plate capacitance, <math>C</math>, we would get the following parasitic capacitances: | ||
+ | * A '''bottom plate parasitic capacitance''', <math>C_\mathrm{bottom}</math>, between the bottom plate and the substrate. | ||
+ | * Perimeter-dependent '''fringing capacitances''', due to the fringing electric fields between the: | ||
+ | *# top plate and bottom plate, <math>C_1</math>, resulting in an increase in the main capacitance predicted by the parallel-plate expression in Eq. 1, | ||
+ | *# top plate and substrate, <math>C_2</math>, adding a ''top plate parasitic capacitance'', and | ||
+ | *# bottom plate and substrate, <math>C_3</math>, again adding to the capacitance predicted by our parallel-plate formula. | ||
+ | Note that it is much harder to model and predict the capacitance due to the non-uniform fringing electric fields. We can reduce the effects of the fringing fields by making the main capacitance much larger than the parasitic fringing capacitances by minimizing the perimeter of the parallel-plate structure. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Alternative Parallel-Plate Structures === | ||
+ | To support the increasing complexity of digital circuits, additional routing layers have been made available in advanced CMOS processes. This increase in metal layers opens up the possibility of using multiple layers, shown in Fig. 2, or even horizontal electric fields, in addition to vertical fields, as seen in Figs. 3 and 4, in creating very high-density, and well controlled, capacitor structures. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | |[[File:Aparicio 4.png|thumb|300px|Figure 2: Stacked horizontal parallel-plates<ref name="aparicio2002">Aparicio, Roberto and Hajimiri, Ali, ''Capacity limits and matching properties of integrated capacitors'', 2002, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37 (3). pp. 384-393. ISSN 0018-9200 (alternative [https://authors.library.caltech.edu/6776/1/APAieeejssc02a.pdf pdf] link)</ref>.]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Aparicio 1.png|thumb|350px|Figure 3: Vertical parallel-plates<ref name="aparicio2002"/>.]] | ||
+ | |[[File:Aparicio 3.png|thumb|350px|Figure 4: Combining vertical and horizontal parallel-plates<ref name="aparicio2002"/>.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | In instances where larger capacitance densities are required, CMOS processes may offer ''metal-insulator-metal'' or MIM capacitor options, where a special metal layer is added, separated by a thin insulator to the metal routing layer underneath, as shown in Fig. 5. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | |[[File:Mim cap.png|thumb|700px|Figure 5: A MIM Capacitor<ref>Phillip Allen's [https://aicdesign.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/lecture06-140818.pdf notes] on integrated capacitors.</ref>.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == PVT Variations == | ||
+ | Similar to integrated resistors, integrated capacitors are heavily dependent on the limitations and characteristics of the CMOS fabrication process. Thus, like resistors, also suffer from process variations and mismatch, as well as exhibit temperature and voltage dependencies, as shown in Table 1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class = "wikitable" style="text-align: center;" | ||
+ | |+ Table 1: Illustrative Capacitance Characteristics | ||
+ | ! Type | ||
+ | ! <math>C\,\mathrm{[aF/\mu m^2]}</math> | ||
+ | ! <math>V_C\,\mathrm{[ppm/V]}</math> | ||
+ | ! <math>T_C\,\mathrm{[ppm/^\circ C]}</math> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | polysilicon-polysilicon (option) | ||
+ | | 1000 | ||
+ | | 10 | ||
+ | | 25 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | metal-metal | ||
+ | | 50 | ||
+ | | 20 | ||
+ | | 30 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | metal-substrate | ||
+ | | 30 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | metal-polysilicon | ||
+ | | 50 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | polysilicon-substrate | ||
+ | | 120 | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | <references /> |
Latest revision as of 06:42, 22 September 2020
Similar to resistors, in a CMOS process optimized for digital circuits, capacitances are treated as parasitic devices that degrade the performance of digital circuits, except in specialized cases such as memory circuits. However, in analog design, we often need capacitors with very well-controlled capacitance values.
Contents
Capacitor Geometries
We can create parallel-plate capacitors using the routing layers, typically a metal layer, separated by the inter-layer dielectric (ILD), typically silicon dioxide. Thus, these structures are known as metal-oxide-metal (MOM) capacitors. The parallel-plate capacitance of the MOM structure shown in Fig. 1, is given by:
-
(1)
-
Where is the capacitance density, or capacitance per unit area, of a particular layer, is the permittivity of the dielectric or insulating material, is the thickness of the dielectric, and is the overlap area of the parallel-plate.
Parasitic Capacitances
In addition to the main parallel-plate capacitance, , we would get the following parasitic capacitances:
- A bottom plate parasitic capacitance, , between the bottom plate and the substrate.
- Perimeter-dependent fringing capacitances, due to the fringing electric fields between the:
- top plate and bottom plate, , resulting in an increase in the main capacitance predicted by the parallel-plate expression in Eq. 1,
- top plate and substrate, , adding a top plate parasitic capacitance, and
- bottom plate and substrate, , again adding to the capacitance predicted by our parallel-plate formula.
Note that it is much harder to model and predict the capacitance due to the non-uniform fringing electric fields. We can reduce the effects of the fringing fields by making the main capacitance much larger than the parasitic fringing capacitances by minimizing the perimeter of the parallel-plate structure.
Alternative Parallel-Plate Structures
To support the increasing complexity of digital circuits, additional routing layers have been made available in advanced CMOS processes. This increase in metal layers opens up the possibility of using multiple layers, shown in Fig. 2, or even horizontal electric fields, in addition to vertical fields, as seen in Figs. 3 and 4, in creating very high-density, and well controlled, capacitor structures.
In instances where larger capacitance densities are required, CMOS processes may offer metal-insulator-metal or MIM capacitor options, where a special metal layer is added, separated by a thin insulator to the metal routing layer underneath, as shown in Fig. 5.
PVT Variations
Similar to integrated resistors, integrated capacitors are heavily dependent on the limitations and characteristics of the CMOS fabrication process. Thus, like resistors, also suffer from process variations and mismatch, as well as exhibit temperature and voltage dependencies, as shown in Table 1.
Type | |||
---|---|---|---|
polysilicon-polysilicon (option) | 1000 | 10 | 25 |
metal-metal | 50 | 20 | 30 |
metal-substrate | 30 | ||
metal-polysilicon | 50 | ||
polysilicon-substrate | 120 |