Synthetic channels
Binary erasure channel
Let
be the erasure probability of a binary erasure channel (BEC).
|
00
|
0?
|
01
|
?0
|
??
|
?1
|
10
|
1?
|
11
|
00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00
|
0?
|
01
|
?0
|
??
|
?1
|
10
|
1?
|
11
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Binary symmetric channel
Let
be the crossover probability of a binary symmetric channel (BSC).
|
00
|
01
|
10
|
11
|
00
|
|
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
00
|
01
|
10
|
11
|
00
|
|
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
|
|
It turns out that the channel
reduces to another BSC. To see this, consider the case where
. To minimize the error probability, we must decide the value of
that has the greater likelihood. For
,
so that the maximum-likelihood (ML) decision is
. Using the same argument, we see that the ML decision is
for
. More generally, the receiver decision is to set
. Indeed, if the crossover probability is low, it is very likely that
and
. Solving for
and plugging it back produces the desired result.