Difference between revisions of "Channel polarization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Adrian Vidal (talk | contribs) |
Adrian Vidal (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | It turns out that the channel <math>W^{-}: U_1 \rightarrow (Y_1, Y_2)</math> reduces to another BSC. To see this, consider the case where <math>(Y_1, Y_2) = (0,0)</math>. To minimize the error probability, we must decide the value of <math>U_1</math> that has the greater likelihood. For <math>0 < p < 0.5</math>, <math> 0.5(1-2p+2p^2) > p(1-p)</math> so that the maximum-likelihood (ML) decision is <math>U_1 = 0</math>. Using the same argument, we see that the ML decision is <math>U_1 = 0</math> for <math>(Y_1,Y_2)=(1,1)</math>. More generally, the receiver decision is to set <math>\hat{U_1} = Y_1 \oplus Y_2</math>. Indeed, if the crossover probability is low, it is very likely that <math>Y_1 = U_2 | + | It turns out that the channel <math>W^{-}: U_1 \rightarrow (Y_1, Y_2)</math> reduces to another BSC. To see this, consider the case where <math>(Y_1, Y_2) = (0,0)</math>. To minimize the error probability, we must decide the value of <math>U_1</math> that has the greater likelihood. For <math>0 < p < 0.5</math>, <math> 0.5(1-2p+2p^2) > p(1-p)</math> so that the maximum-likelihood (ML) decision is <math>U_1 = 0</math>. Using the same argument, we see that the ML decision is <math>U_1 = 0</math> for <math>(Y_1,Y_2)=(1,1)</math>. More generally, the receiver decision is to set <math>\hat{U_1} = Y_1 \oplus Y_2</math>. Indeed, if the crossover probability is low, it is very likely that <math>Y_1 = U_2 \oplus U_1</math> and <math>Y_2 = U_2</math>. Solving for <math>U_2</math> and plugging it back produces the desired result. |
Revision as of 04:48, 7 May 2021
Synthetic channels
Binary erasure channel
Let be the erasure probability of a binary erasure channel (BEC).
00 | 0? | 01 | ?0 | ?? | ?1 | 10 | 1? | 11 | |
00 | |||||||||
01 | |||||||||
10 | |||||||||
11 |
00 | 0? | 01 | ?0 | ?? | ?1 | 10 | 1? | 11 | |
0 | |||||||||
1 |
Binary symmetric channel
Let be the crossover probability of a binary symmetric channel (BSC).
00 | 01 | 10 | 11 | |
00 | ||||
01 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 |
00 | 01 | 10 | 11 | |
00 | ||||
01 |
It turns out that the channel reduces to another BSC. To see this, consider the case where . To minimize the error probability, we must decide the value of that has the greater likelihood. For , so that the maximum-likelihood (ML) decision is . Using the same argument, we see that the ML decision is for . More generally, the receiver decision is to set . Indeed, if the crossover probability is low, it is very likely that and . Solving for and plugging it back produces the desired result.